Rat Submandibular Gland Epithelial Cells

Cat.No.: CSC-C5035S

Species: Rat

Source: Salivary Gland

Cell Type: Epithelial Cell

  • Specification
  • Background
  • Scientific Data
  • Q & A
  • Customer Review
Cat.No.
CSC-C5035S
Description
The submandibular gland is the second largest of the three main salivary glands. The submandibular glands are paired major salivary glands that lie in the submandibular triangle. The glands have a superficial and deep lobe separated by the mylohyoid muscle.
Rat Submandibular Gland Epithelial Cells (rSGECs) from Creative Bioarray are isolated from the rat submandibular gland tissue. The method we use to isolate rSGECs was developed based on a combination of established and our proprietary methods. The rSGECs are characterized by immunofluorescence with antibodies specific to Cytokeratin-8 (CK-8). Each vial contains 0.5x10^6 cells per ml and is delivered frozen.
Species
Rat
Source
Salivary Gland
Cell Type
Epithelial Cell
Disease
Normal
Quality Control
Rat Submandibular Gland Epithelial Cells are negative for HIV-1, HBV, HCV, mycoplasma, bacteria, yeast and fungi.
Storage and Shipping
Creative Bioarray ships frozen cells on dry ice. On receipt, immediately transfer frozen cells to liquid nitrogen (-180 °C) until ready for experimental use. Never can cells be kept at -20 °C.
Citation Guidance
If you use this products in your scientific publication, it should be cited in the publication as: Creative Bioarray cat no. If your paper has been published, please click here to submit the PubMed ID of your paper to get a coupon.

Rat Submandibular Gland Epithelial Cells are primary epithelial cells derived from the submandibular glands of healthy rats. The submandibular gland is one of the major salivary glands and is involved in saliva production, oral lubrication, digestion, and the maintenance of oral homeostasis. Epithelial cells are the main functional cells in the gland and they are organized into acinar and ductal structures that secrete, modify and transport saliva. These cells therefore offer a physiologically relevant in vitro model for the investigation of salivary gland function and epithelial biology.

Rat submandibular gland epithelial cells have a polygonal cobblestone-like morphology and grow as an adherent monolayer in culture. They express epithelial markers cytokeratins and epithelial cell adhesion molecules. They retain characteristics associated with salivary gland epithelial function. These cells respond to neurotransmitters, growth factors, inflammatory mediators, and extracellular matrix cues that regulate epithelial proliferation, differentiation, secretion, and tissue remodeling.

Rat Submandibular Gland Epithelial Cells are routinely used in studies of salivary gland physiology, epithelial regeneration and glandular injury. These are useful experimental platforms to study mechanisms of salivary secretion, epithelial barrier function, oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, cell-matrix interactions. These cells are also used to study radiation-induced damage of salivary glands, autoimmune diseases of the salivary glands, tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and testing of therapeutic agents to maintain or restore salivary gland function.

Acetylcholine Does Not Affect Branching or Proliferation but Is Present During Submandibular Gland Myoepithelial Differentiation

Myoepithelial cells (MECs) contract to expel saliva under parasympathetic control, yet the molecular signals driving SG epithelial cells to differentiate into MECs adjacent to parasympathetic nerves remain unclear. Shindo et al. used an ex vivo embryonic submandibular gland (SMG) organ culture model with carbachol (CCh), a cholinergic agonist, to test whether acetylcholine signaling influences SMG development.

E13.5 SMGs cultured 72 h with CCh showed no significant differences in branching morphogenesis or end‑bud number compared to control (Fig. 1a, b). Similarly, tetrodotoxin (TTX, 10 µM), a Na⁺‑channel blocker, did not alter branching, indicating TTX‑sensitive neuronal activity is not required for early SMG morphogenesis.

Proliferation was assessed by Ki67 immunostaining in situand CCK‑8 assay on the rat SG epithelial cell line RSMG‑1. The proportion of Ki67⁺ epithelial cells in end‑buds was unchanged by CCh treatment (Fig. 1c), and RSMG‑1 cell proliferation was likewise unaffected (Fig. 1d).

These results demonstrate that cholinergic agonist exposure does not​ alter SMG branching morphogenesis or epithelial cell proliferation, establishing a baseline for investigating acetylcholine’s specific role in inducing myoepithelial cell differentiation near parasympathetic nerve terminals.

CCh does not affect SMG morphogenesis or cell proliferation.
Fig. 1. CCh does not affect SMG morphogenesis or cell proliferation (Shindo Y, Nakamura H M, et al., 2022).

Ask a Question

Write your own review

  • You May Also Need

For research use only. Not for any other purpose.

Hot Products