Optimization Strategies of Cell-Based Assays

Pre-assay: Choosing Model Systems and Culture Microenvironment

1. Cell sources

The selection of cell sources is a critical step that affects the optimization of experimental design and results and thus the credibility of the cell-based assay. Researchers can select appropriate cell models from options including immortalized cell lines and primary cells as well as stem cells iPSCs/ESCs organoids and co-culture systems based on their specific research objectives and experimental needs.

• Immortalized Cell Lines: These, like HeLa and HepG2, are common in research and drug screening due to ease of cultivation and unlimited proliferation, but they may not accurately mimic complex real-world conditions due to genetic and phenotypic variations.
• Primary Cells: Directly isolated from tissues, these have high functionality and tissue specificity but are hard to obtain in large quantities, have short lifespans, and require complex culturing, limiting them in large-scale studies.
• Stem Cells (iPSCs, ESCs): Known for self-renewal and differentiation, they're used in constructing organoids, 3D-tissue models, and disease modeling. iPSCs, for instance, aid in creating organoid models of various organs like the brain, liver, and kidney.
• Organoids: These 3D clusters from stem cells replicate organ structures and functions, offering vast potential in drug screening, disease modeling, and toxicity assessments—for example, utilizing brain organoids to study neurodevelopmental disorders.
• Co-Culture Systems: By culturing multiple cell types together, this method better simulates tissue microenvironments, aiding in the exploration of cell interactions and tissue stability.

2. Cultivation microenvironment

The cultivation microenvironment of cell cultures can also exert strong impacts on their growth, differentiation and functions. Optimization of cell culture conditions can be helpful to increase the predictive power and robustness of cell-based assays.

• 2D vs. 3D Cultures: 2D cell culture is very convenient to manipulation, but often lacks the 3D structures and ECM interactions in physiological relevance. A 3D-culture system such as organoids, hydrogel scaffolds, etc. could be used to provide a more physiologically relevant culture environment to promote cell differentiation and functions. For example, liver organ-on-a-chip models were established by using 3D culture techniques to recapitulate microstructures and metabolic functions of the liver, and also to provide a new platform to study drug-induced liver injury.
• Matrix Gels and Scaffolds: Matrix gels (e.g. Matrigel) or biological scaffolds (e.g. hydrogel, collagen) provide a physical support for cells to proliferate in 3D, and can also be used to promote cell polarization and tissue formation. Matrix gels or biological scaffolds are also very important for organoid culture to maintain the stem cell pluripotency and differentiation.
• Shear Stress and Hypoxic/Hyperoxic Conditions: Specific hydrodynamic conditions and hypoxic/hyperoxic conditions must be applied when growing cells for tumor modeling or tissue engineering applications. Microfluidic chips can be utilized to recapitulate shear stress experienced by the cells in vivo, thus to more accurately represent their behavior in blood vessels or tissues. Hypoxic or hyperoxic conditions can also be applied to mimic tumor microenvironments or tissue hypoxia, which are important to study the responses of cells to low oxygen levels.

Mid-assay: Crafting Suitable Detection Strategies and Experimental Conditions

1. Endpoint selection

Endpoint selection is an important part of experimental design for cell-based assays. Typical endpoints include cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, metabolism, signal transduction, and protein secretion. The selection of the endpoint depends on the research purpose and experimental conditions. When assessing cytotoxicity of drugs endpoints are cell proliferation or apoptosis whereas cell differentiation process studies measure differentiation endpoints.

2. Probes and dyes

The use of probes and dyes in cell-based assays may impact the accuracy of experimental results. The commonly used probes and dyes include fluorescent probes and dyes, bioluminescent probes and dyes, FRET/BRET probes and dyes, calcium indicators, membrane potential dyes, etc. The selection of probes and dyes depends on the research purpose and cell type. For instance, fluorescent dyes can be used for apoptosis and proliferation detection; calcium indicators can be used to detect changes in intracellular calcium ion concentration. In addition, to improve the specificity and accuracy of detection, we should select highly specific and high-affinity antibodies or probes, and optimize the concentration and formulation.

3. Microplate and chip formats

The selection of microplate and chip formats in cell-based assays is critical for high-throughput and automation. The commonly used microplate formats include 96-well plates, 384-well plates, 1536-well plates, etc. The design and surface treatment of microplates will directly impact cell growth and experimental results. For example, the 96-well plate is provided with three surface types: untreated surface, immuno surface, and cell culture surface. In addition, with the advancement of microfluidic chip (Lab-on-a-chip) technology, various microfluidic chips have been developed and applied in cell-based assays, offering new solutions.

4. Internal and control strategies

Internal and control strategies are essential in cell-based assays to ensure the reliability of experimental results. Common controls include positive controls, negative controls, Z'-factor, coefficient of variation (CV%), and normalization methods. For example, a positive control verifies the experimental method's effectiveness, while a negative control eliminates background interference.

5. Optimization of experimental conditions

Optimization of experimental conditions is essential to achieve accurate and reproducible experimental results. The experimental conditions include cell density, medium composition, temperature, pH, CO₂ concentration, humidity, selection of time points, and avoiding interference with the cell microenvironment during the experiment. By systematically adjusting and optimizing experimental conditions, we can improve the sensitivity and specificity of the assays, reduce background noise, and ensure the consistency and reproducibility of experimental results under different conditions.

Post-assay: Data Analysis and Quality Control, R&D (Methods Development)

1. Preprocessing of raw data

The general workflow for preprocessing raw data of cell-based assays usually includes a few key steps, such as background subtraction, flat-field correction, and well-to-well drift correction. Background subtraction is the process of subtracting a background value from each well's signal to remove nonspecific signals. Flat-field correction is a process that is used to correct for variations in image brightness caused by uneven illumination of the optical system. This can be useful for improving the contrast and uniformity of the images. Well-to-well drift correction is a process that involves adjusting the signals from each well to account for signal drift between wells that may have occurred due to changes in experimental conditions, such as temperature or humidity, over the course of the experiment.

2. Statistics and biological replicates

Power analysis, batch effect and biological replicates are also important for cell-based assays. Researchers can utilize power analysis to establish the necessary sample size for their experimental work. Researchers utilize it to evaluate the experimental design's statistical power and determine if the sample number is sufficient. Biological replicates are samples from the same group that are independently collected, processed, and assayed in parallel. In cell-based assays, biological replicates are used to assess the consistency and reproducibility of the assay. Systematic differences known as batch effects that emerge during experiments can be handled through careful experimental design methods including batch randomization and statistical correction techniques such as linear models.

3. Inter-laboratory cross-validation (ring trial)

Inter-laboratory cross-validation (ring trial) can also be a useful verification method to confirm the transferability of the cell-based assay method. The same experiment is performed in multiple laboratories in order to assess the stability and reproducibility of the method. It may also be necessary to use standard operating procedures (SOPs) in different laboratories to ensure the repeatability of the experiments. SOPs should be established for all aspects of the experiment, including the experimental steps, reagents used, instrument calibration, etc. and should be strictly followed.

4. Correlation with in vivo/clinical data

The results of in vitro experiments must be correlated with in vivo/clinical data to ensure their clinical relevance. This process often involves comparing in vitro data with data from animal models or clinical trials.

Creative Bioarray Relevant Recommendations