Grunt Fin (GF)

Cat.No.: CSC-C9052H

Species: Haemulon sciurus (Bluestriped grunt)

Source: Fin

Morphology: Fibroblast-like

Culture Properties: Adherent

  • Specification
  • Background
  • Scientific Data
  • Q & A
  • Customer Review
Cat.No.
CSC-C9052H
Description
Derived from fin tissue of the adult salt water blue striped Grunt. Does not support the replication of influenza A, herpes simplex, adeno, polio, dengue and eastern equine encephalitis viruses.
Species
Haemulon sciurus (Bluestriped grunt)
Source
Fin
Recommended Medium
EMEM, 90%; h.i. FBS, 10%
Culture Properties
Adherent
Morphology
Fibroblast-like
Karyotype
Modal no. 47
Storage and Shipping
liquid nitrogen vapor phase
Synonyms
Grunt Fin; GF
Citation Guidance
If you use this products in your scientific publication, it should be cited in the publication as: Creative Bioarray cat no. If your paper has been published, please click here to submit the PubMed ID of your paper to get a coupon.

The Grunt Fin (GF) cell line is a spontaneously immortalized fibroblast-like line derived from the caudal/pectoral fin tissue of an adult saltwater Bluestriped Grunt (Haemulon sciurus), first established in 1961. It grows as an adherent monolayer with a modal chromosome number of 47 and is cultured at 20-25°C in EMEM (with elevated NaCl to mimic seawater osmolarity) supplemented with 10-20% FBS. The line is sensitive to plastic type and has relatively low plating efficiency post-thaw.

In the literature, GF cells are a cornerstone model in aquaculture virology and fish disease research. They are one of the preferred cell lines for the isolation and propagation of megalocytiviruses (Red Sea Bream Iridovirus, RSIV) and have been used to produce the formalin-inactivated RSIV vaccine-a commercially significant fish viral vaccine. GF cells are also employed in aquatic ecotoxicology, serving as an in vitro platform for assessing cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of environmental pollutants (heavy metals, pesticides, microplastics) on marine teleost cells. Additionally, they are used in fish cell senescence, DNA repair, and comparative genomics studies, and as a non-mammalian baseline for evaluating the bio-compatibility of biomaterials in marine contexts.

Establishment and Characterization of a Dwarf Gourami Fin (DGF) Cell Line for Iridovirus Propagation

Fish-derived primary cell lines are invaluable for virological studies due to their rapid growth and high viral susceptibility. Jeong et al. established a novel cell line, dwarf gourami fin (DGF), derived from the caudal fin of Trichogaster lalius, and characterized its optimal growth conditions, karyotype, transfection efficiency, and viral susceptibility.

Viral susceptibility assays revealed distinct cytopathic effects (CPE) across cell lines. Following red sea bream iridovirus (RSIV) inoculation, typical megalocytivirus CPE (cell rounding, shrinking, detachment) was observed in DGF, RBF, and GF cells within 7 days, whereas PMF cells exhibited only rounding (Fig. 1A). Infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus (ISKNV) induced weak CPE in GF cells, but none in PMF cells. Notably, DGF and RBF cells exhibited extensive cell enlargement and rounding by 4 days post-infection (dpi) with ISKNV, progressing to monolayer disruption in RBF cells, though DGF cells retained monolayer integrity through 7 dpi (Fig. 1B).

Quantification of supernatants at 7 dpi revealed distinct viral replication profiles (Fig. 1C). For RSIV, PMF cells yielded the highest titers (5.98 × 10¹⁰ genome copies/mL; 109.44 TCID₅₀/mL), approximately fivefold higher than DGF cells, though infectious titers were not statistically different. Conversely, DGF cells supported the highest ISKNV replication (5.22 × 10⁹ genome copies/mL; 10⁸·⁴⁸ TCID₅₀/mL), which was approximately 100-fold greater than in RBF cells and significantly higher than in GF cells (3.27 × 10⁵ genome copies/mL). These results demonstrate that the DGF cell line is a highly susceptible and efficient model for ISKNV propagation.

Comparison of cytopathic effect of red sea bream iridovirus- and infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus-inoculated cells.

Fig. 1. Comparison of cytopathic effect of red sea bream iridovirus- and infectious spleen and kidney necrosis virus-inoculated cells (Jeong Y, Kim K, et al., 2023).

Ask a Question

Write your own review

  • You May Also Need

For research use only. Not for any other purpose.

Hot Products