Immortalized Human Keratocytes (HPV16 E6/E7)

Cat.No.: CSC-I2093Z

Species: homo sapiens

Morphology: Polygonal

Culture Properties: Adherent

  • Specification
  • Background
  • Scientific Data
  • Q & A
  • Customer Review
Cat.No.
CSC-I2093Z
Description
Immortalized Human Keratocytes were developed from human tissue, which have been developed by immortalizing primary human keratocytes with HPV16 E6/E7 gene. Immortalized cells were controlled passaging side by side with the primary cells. Primary cells go into senescence after the 4th passage while the HPV16 E6/E7 gene‐tranduced cells go beyond 30 passages.
Species
homo sapiens
Recommended Medium
SuperCult® Immortalized Human Keratocyte Medium (Cat No.: CM-I2093Z)
Freezing Medium
Complete medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) DMSO
Culture Properties
Adherent
Morphology
Polygonal
Immortalization Method
HPV16 E6/E7 gene
Growth Properties
Cells are cultured as a monolayer at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.
Shipping
Dry Ice.
Quality Control
Real Time PCR was used to quantify HPV16 E6/E7 gene expression in immortalized cell line.
free from contaminations (bacteria incl. mycoplasma, fungi, HIV, HAV, HBV, HCV, Parvo-B19) and cross-contaminations
Storage and Shipping
Directly and immediately transfer cells from dry ice to liquid nitrogen upon receiving and keep the cells in liquid nitrogen until cell culture needed for experiments.

Note: Never can cells be kept at -20°C.
Citation Guidance
If you use this products in your scientific publication, it should be cited in the publication as: Creative Bioarray cat no. If your paper has been published, please click here to submit the PubMed ID of your paper to get a coupon.

Immortalized Human Keratocytes (HPV16 E6/E7) are human corneal stromal keratocyte-derived cells that have been immortalized by stable expression of the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) E6 and E7 oncogenes. The predominant resident cells of the corneal stroma are keratocytes, which are essential for corneal transparency, organization of the extracellular matrix, and stromal homeostasis. Keratocytes in their original form govern the synthesis of collagen types I and V, keratan sulfate proteoglycans, and other stromal matrix components critical for corneal biomechanics and optical clarity.

Immortalized Human Keratocytes (HPV16 E6/E7) have important functional properties of corneal stromal cells including fibroblast-like shape, susceptibility to growth factors such as TGF-β and FGF, and the ability to rebuild extracellular matrix and engage in wound healing processes. These cells represent a stable and reproducible in vitro model for long-term experimental studies compared to primary keratocytes.

These cells are commonly employed in ophthalmic researches such as corneal wound healing, fibrosis (corneal scarring), stromal cell differentiation, keratocyte-to-myofibroblast transition, and biomaterial evaluation for corneal restoration. They are also beneficial for studies of virus-host interactions, oxidative stress responses and signaling pathways involved in maintaining corneal transparency.

Epithelial Cell Response to Titanium and Zirconia-Coated Titanium Surfaces

Memè et al. compared the epithelial biological response to machined titanium Ti-6Al-4V grade 5 (T1) and the same alloy coated with zirconia nitride (ZrN) via physical vapor deposition (T2). Human immortalized keratinocytes (HUKE) were cultured with T1 and T2 discs, alongside untreated controls (C). Surface characterization using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) confirmed compositional and structural differences between T1 and T2.

Cell viability was assessed at 24, 48, and 72 h using trypan blue and MTT assays. Both T1 and T2 significantly reduced keratinocyte viability compared to C (p < 0.05), but no significant difference was observed between the two materials (Figs. 1, 2). These findings indicate that while both surfaces adversely affect epithelial cell viability, zirconia coating did not confer additional biological benefit under the tested conditions.

Trypan blue assay. The graph represents cell viability of the specimens (T1, T2, and C) at different time points (24, 48, and 72 h).

Fig. 1. Trypan blue assay. The graph represents cell viability of the specimens (T1, T2, and C) at different time points (24, 48, and 72 h) (Memè L, Sartini D, et al., 2022).

MTT assay. The graph illustrates cell viability of T1 or T2 compared with that of C at different time points (24, 48, and 72 h) of incubation with discs.

Fig. 2. MTT assay. The graph illustrates cell viability of T1 or T2 compared with that of C at different time points (24, 48, and 72 h) of incubation with discs (Memè L, Sartini D, et al., 2022).

Ask a Question

Write your own review

For research use only. Not for any other purpose.

Hot Products