Featured Products

Our Promise to You

Guaranteed product quality, expert customer support

Our Promise to You

ONLINE INQUIRY

FKH-1

Cat.No.: CSC-C0613

Species: Human

Source: acute myelocytic leukemia

Morphology: mostly single, round cells in suspension

Culture Properties: suspension

  • Specification
  • Background
  • Scientific Data
  • Q & A
  • Customer Review
Cat.No.
CSC-C0613
Description
Established in 1993 from the peripheral blood of a 61-year-old man with Philadelphia chromosome negative chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with trilineage myelodysplasia at refractory leukemic transformation into acute myeloid leukemia (AML M4); carries t(6;9)(p23;q34) leading to DEK-NUP214 (DEK-CAN) fusion gene; cells do not respond to G-CSF, as originally described
Species
Human
Source
acute myelocytic leukemia
Recommended Medium
Culture Properties
suspension
Morphology
mostly single, round cells in suspension
Karyotype
Human hypodiploid karyotype with 4% polyploidy; 45(43-46)<2n>XY, -7, t(6;9)(p23;q34); carries t(6;9) effecting rearrangement of DEK with NUP214 (CAN); closely resembles published karyotype
Quality Control
Mycoplasma: negative in microbiological culture, PCR assays
Immunology: CD3 -, CD4 +, CD11b +, CD13 +, CD14 -, CD15 +, CD19 -, CD33 +, HLA-DR +
Viruses: PCR: EBV -, HBV -, HCV -, HIV -, HTLV-I/II -, SMRV -
Storage and Shipping
Frozen with 70% medium, 20% FBS, 10% DMSO at about 7 x 10^6 cells/ampoule; ship in dry ice; store in liquid nitrogen
Citation Guidance
If you use this products in your scientific publication, it should be cited in the publication as: Creative Bioarray cat no. If your paper has been published, please click here to submit the PubMed ID of your paper to get a coupon.

In 1993, researchers established the FKH-1 cell line from a 61-year-old male patient's peripheral blood who was suffering from Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). The patient developed trilineage myelodysplasia which evolved into acute myeloid leukemia (AML M4) during the refractory stage of leukemia transformation. FKH-1 is a suspension cell line comprising single round cells in culture medium which researchers use to investigate molecular processes and drug reactions in AML. This cell line assists researchers in examining chromosomal irregularities as well as gene expression patterns and drug reaction profiles. It serves as a comparison tool alongside OCI-AML6 and Kasumi-1 cell lines to identify molecular distinctions between different AML subtypes. FH-1 demonstrates significant molecular pathways and gene expression controls, such as elevated MYC expression and stable β-actin levels to provide control benchmarks, which makes it a perfect system for studying AML pathogenesis and therapeutic targets.

DEK::NUP214-Expressing FKH-1 Cells Depend on XPO1 for Their Oncogenic Activity

DEK::NUP214 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a distinct subtype of AML characterized by poor prognosis and resistance to chemotherapy. The DEK::NUP214 fusion protein is implicated in adverse clinical outcomes and interacts with XPO1, a nuclear export protein involved in crucial cellular processes. Given XPO1's role in various cancers, its inhibition has the potential to counteract DEK::NUP214-associated malignancy.

Utilizing human AML models, Charles Cano et al. explored XPO1's role by deleting it in DEK::NUP214-positive cells and applying the XPO1 inhibitor eltanexor. They validated DEK::NUP214 and XPO1 expression in FKH-1 cells using established leukemia cell lines as controls. RT-qPCR and Western blot showed that only FKH-1 cells expressed DEK::NUP214, while XPO1 was similarly expressed in both lines (Fig. 1A, B). Sequencing confirmed the DEK::NUP214 breakpoint (Fig. 2A), and co-immunoprecipitation confirmed XPO1's interaction with DEK::NUP214 (Fig. 1C). They deleted XPO1 in FKH-1 cells and controls using CRISPR/CAS9. Post-nucleofection, annexin V+ cells increased over time in XPO1-depleted FKH-1 cells, reducing viability and growth rate (Fig. 1D-F). RT-qPCR and immunoblotting confirmed XPO1 knockdown (Fig. 2D and E). Immunofluorescence showed decreased XPO1 and DEK::NUP214 co-localization in XPO1-depleted cells (Fig. 2F). In control lines, XPO1 knockdown had minimal effects. Thus, DEK::NUP214-expressing FKH-1 cells depend on XPO1 for their oncogenic activity.

DEK::NUP214 leukemia is reliant on XPO1.Fig. 1. DEK::NUP214 leukemia depends on XPO1 (Charles Cano F, Kloos A, et al., 2025).

Creation of XPO1-deficient FKH-1 cells.Fig. 2. Generation of XPO1 knockout in FKH-1 cells (Charles Cano F, Kloos A, et al., 2025).

Leukemogenic NUP214 Fusion Proteins Locate to Nuclear Bodies in Patient-Derived Cells

Acute leukemia cases frequently display chromosomal translocations that produce SET-NUP214 and DEK-NUP214 fusion proteins from NUP214 which result in poor patient prognoses and resistance to treatment. CRM1 becomes a key player in leucemogenic processes because these fusion proteins disrupt nuclear export through CRM1. Mendes et al. aim to evaluate the potential of CRM1 as a therapeutic target in NUP214-related leukemia.

Using leukemia cell lines with endogenous SET-NUP214 and DEK-NUP214, they investigated the effects of CRM1 inhibition with LMB and SINE KPT-185 on protein localization and leukemia cell proliferation and viability. First, they examined the localization of NUP214 fusion proteins in various leukemia cell lines using anti-NUP214 antibodies and immunofluorescence microscopy. SET-NUP214 was found at the nuclear rim and in nuclear bodies in both LOUCY and MEGAL cells (Fig. 3A). In contrast, FKH-1 cells showed DEK-NUP214 in smaller nuclear bodies (Fig. 3A). GFP-tagged SET-NUP214 and DEK-NUP214 exhibited similar localizations in HCT-116 cells (Fig. 3B). In FKH-1 cells, NUP214 antibodies also marked the nuclear rim, likely indicating endogenous NUP214 rather than the fusion protein. OCI-AML1 and MOLM-13 cells showed typical nucleoporin patterns at the nuclear rim, as they do not express NUP214 fusions (Fig. 3A). To explore FG repeat cohesion in SET-NUP214 body formation, LOUCY cells were treated with 5% 1,6-hexanediol, disrupting nuclear bodies within 10 minutes, illustrating their dependence on FG repeat interactions (Fig. 3C).

NUP214 fusion proteins are situated in specific nuclear bodies.Fig. 3. NUP214 fusion proteins localize to distinct nuclear bodies (Mendes A, Jühlen R, et al., 2020).

What stage is best for karyotyping?

For karyotyping the chromosomes must be isolated from cells in the metaphase, which is the stage of the cell cycle in which the chromosomes assume their characteristic condensed, discrete shape.

Ask a Question

Average Rating: 5.0    |    1 Scientist has reviewed this product

Helpful

We have been able to use this product to study the effects of various cancer mutations on cell behavior.

26 Feb 2022


Ease of use

After sales services

Value for money


Write your own review

  • You May Also Need

For research use only. Not for any other purpose.